Test Suites and Deterministic Execution Models
Ensuring Clause Predictability, Replayability, and Validation Across Jurisdictions and Environments
3.9.1 Why Determinism Matters in Smart Clause Execution
In high-stakes governance, non-deterministic behavior is unacceptable.
Whether triggered by simulations, sensors, or agent actions, clause execution must be:
Predictable: Always yield the same result for the same inputs
Testable: Able to run in controlled conditions pre-deployment
Auditable: Recorded and replayable with exact input traces
Consistent: Across TEEs, ZK systems, sovereign nodes, and public chains
NSF mandates deterministic clause execution using standardized test suites, reference environments, and output attestation mechanisms.
3.9.2 NSF Determinism Guarantees
Each clause must conform to:
Deterministic logic evaluation (no randomness or uncontrolled state)
Bounded side effects (credential issuance, simulation invocation)
Traceable input bindings (with exact parameter values)
Canonical order of operations (governance-defined clause resolution order)
Hardware/runtime abstraction (execution behaves identically across environments)
3.9.3 Clause Test Suite Requirements
For every Smart Clause, a Test Suite is required, consisting of:
Test vectors
Defined inputs and expected outputs, across parameter bounds
Edge cases
Boundary inputs, unusual jurisdictional mappings
Trigger tests
Trigger behavior for time, event, threshold
Credential scenarios
Tests with revoked, expired, and invalid credentials
Simulation mocks
Known simulation outputs for logic branches
Fork comparison
Cross-version behavior and regression checks
CAC replays
Reference executions from live environments
3.9.4 Test Suite Formats and Execution Models
Test suites are expressed in:
JSON or YAML: Input vectors + expected outputs
Executable markdown (for documentation-linked tests)
Simulation-linked test cases: Model inputs + forecasts
TS/Go-based runner environments (optional CLI SDKs)
All tests are:
Signed by test author or DAO validator
Version-controlled in the Registry Layer
Linkable to governance packets (e.g.,
ClauseApprovalVote@hash
)
3.9.5 Environments for Deterministic Execution
NSF supports four certified environments:
Reference Interpreter
Official clause interpreter written in Rust or Go
TEE Runtime
Secure enclave-executed clause runner with audit signing
ZK Runtime
Proof-generating engine using circuit-compiled clause logic
Simulated Environment
Developer runner with full control for governance DAO testing
Each environment:
Loads clause + metadata
Resolves parameter bindings
Executes against input
Produces output trace + CAC
Writes to Audit Layer (if configured)
3.9.6 CAC Verification and Deterministic Replay
Every Clause-Attested Compute (CAC) record includes:
Input hash
Execution environment hash
Output value
Trigger metadata
Credential snapshot
Timestamp
Jurisdiction context
Replay tools can load a clause, its inputs, and rerun it to verify identical outputs:
nsf-replay --clause-id ICAO::Aviation::[email protected] --cac-id CAC#b67f2...
The clause must reproduce the exact same behavior, or the replay fails.
3.9.7 Fork Testing and Compatibility Validation
Forked clauses must:
Include regression tests against parent logic
Declare changed behavior explicitly
Provide simulation diffs (where applicable)
Maintain compatibility unless intentionally diverged (with governance signoff)
Fork validator tool:
nsf-fork-compare --parent=UNFCCC::[email protected] --fork=EU::[email protected]
Returns pass/fail + changelog trace.
3.9.8 Credential State and Input Consistency Tests
Clauses that rely on credentials must pass:
Revocation path tests
Jurisdictional mapping edge cases
Credential expiration scenarios
Cross-chain proof validation (if credentials come from external networks)
Simulated credentials for test:
{
"type": "DisasterReliefOperatorVC",
"status": "revoked",
"issuer": "WFP",
"revokedOn": "2025-02-21"
}
These are used to assert that clause logic fails or adapts appropriately.
3.9.9 CI/CD Integration for Clause Governance Pipelines
NSF provides tools to integrate clause test suites into DAO governance workflows:
Pre-vote clause linting
Governance CLI for test approval
Automatic simulation compatibility checks
CI pipelines for staging and production environments
Audit certificate generation on test suite success
All test runs and approvals are signed and stored in the Audit Layer, e.g.:
testStatus: PASSED
executedBy: ClimateDAO
timestamp: 2025-03-11T12:00Z
signature: 0x83d9...
3.9.10 Deterministic Execution as the Foundation of Trust
In NSF:
Every clause is provable
Every CAC is replayable
Every change is regression-tested
Every environment is audited and spec-compliant
This enables:
Machine-verifiable policy execution
Multi-jurisdictional harmonization
Scientific reproducibility of simulations
Legal forensics for disputes and overrides
Operational confidence for autonomous agents
Determinism transforms governance from assumption to execution proof.
Last updated
Was this helpful?