Lifecycle
The Structured Path from Clause Conception to Governance-Approved Execution and Sunset
3.2.1 Clause Lifecycle in NSF: Overview
Every Smart Clause in the NSF protocol passes through a deterministic, audit-traceable, and governance-controlled lifecycle:
Draft – A new clause is proposed in SCL with supporting metadata
Simulate – The clause is linked to a simulation package and risk scenarios
Review – Governance DAOs validate, test, and vote on clause activation
Deploy – The clause becomes active and callable in the execution layer
Evolve – Forks, overrides, or jurisdictional adaptations may occur
Deprecate – Clause is replaced or retired, but its audit trail remains immutable
This lifecycle ensures all clauses are credible, auditable, and governed from proposal to sunset.
3.2.2 Stage 1 – Draft
At the Draft stage:
A clause is authored using SCL (Smart Clause Language)
Metadata is declared: jurisdiction, clause type, inputs/outputs, credential impacts
Linked clause references and reusable templates can be included
The draft clause is:
Signed by the author (DID-anchored)
Versioned (v0.x.x)
Stored in the Draft Registry (a special namespace in the Registry Layer)
Draft clauses are non-executable and must not produce CACs.
Optional: Authors may include draft simulation stubs to describe intended behavior.
3.2.3 Stage 2 – Simulate
To move from draft to deployable, every clause must be simulated.
This step involves:
Selecting or creating a Simulation Package
Binding the simulation to the clause input structure and logic
Defining:
Forecast windows
Input datasets
Risk scenarios
Geographic overlays
Variable boundaries
The simulation package must be:
Reproducible
Signed by its authors
Stored in the Simulation Layer
Reviewed by domain-specific simulation validators
Simulation results are:
Linked to the clause draft
Included in governance DAO packets for review
Made accessible for downstream foresight comparison
3.2.4 Stage 3 – Review and DAO Governance
Once simulated, the clause is subject to:
Formal Review by relevant domain or jurisdictional DAOs
Public Comment period (optional or mandatory, per DAO rules)
Governance Voting based on:
Simulation results
Risk classification
Jurisdictional relevance
Credential dependencies
Each vote creates:
A signed governance record
A quorum trace
A reference to the clause hash and simulation bundle
If the clause is approved, it is moved from Draft Registry to Active Registry, signed by the approving DAO.
3.2.5 Stage 4 – Deploy
Upon successful governance vote:
The clause becomes active and callable via Communication Layer APIs
Is registered in the Global Clause Registry
Can now:
Issue or revoke credentials
Trigger TEE/ZK execution
Be used as a reference in other clauses
Be linked in DAO proposals or compliance tools
At this stage:
All executions produce CACs
The clause enters the audit trail
DAO oversight transitions from proposal authority to version governance
Each clause is deployed with a unique Clause ID, generated as:
Original: ICAO::Aviation::[email protected]
Forked: India::DGCA::[email protected]
E.g., ICAO::Aviation::[email protected]
3.2.6 Stage 5 – Evolution and Forking
After deployment, a clause may evolve through:
Minor upgrades (e.g., patch to correct a logic error, without simulation rerun)
Major upgrades (require new simulation + governance cycle)
Forks (for jurisdictional customization or policy divergence)
Each change generates:
A new clause ID
Simulation comparison report (if relevant)
Fork lineage in the Registry Layer
Metadata tags to track:
Parent clause
DAO that authorized the fork
Jurisdiction of divergence
Compatibility impacts
Forks are not deletions—they are traceable expressions of institutional autonomy.
3.2.7 Stage 6 – Deprecation
A clause may be deprecated due to:
Incompatibility with new policies
DAO vote to sunset based on audit/simulation outcomes
Replacement by a new clause version
Governance decision after failure, dispute, or override
Deprecation:
Freezes the clause state
Prevents new executions or CACs
Marks status in the Global Clause Registry
Retains full audit trace for every previous execution
Deprecated clauses remain discoverable, reviewable, and citable—but no longer active in production governance.
3.2.8 Full Lifecycle Traceability
NSF ensures:
Every clause has a governance-proven origin
Every change is tracked in the version tree and registry index
Every deployment is anchored to:
Simulation results
DAO governance
Audit-proven execution
Every sunset is documented with cause, time, and jurisdictional signatures
This model creates multi-jurisdictional trust with complete memory—something no traditional legal or policy system offers.
3.2.9 Tools Supporting Lifecycle Workflow
NSF provides:
SCL IDEs for clause authorship and syntax validation
Simulation runners and test harnesses
Governance dashboard for DAO review and vote tracking
Registry viewers for clause trace inspection
Audit tools for historical replay
Fork diff visualizers for policy comparison
Lifecycle event emitters (subscribe to all clause state changes)
All tools are open, credential-accessible, and verifiably linked to clause states.
3.2.10 Lifecycle as Governance Discipline
In NSF, the clause lifecycle:
Prevents opaque policy changes
Requires simulation before authority
Enforces jurisdictional boundaries through transparent forks
Tracks upgrades and deprecations across time and institutions
Encodes governance as a live, inspectable process—not a paper trail
With this lifecycle, governance becomes verifiable software, not hidden process.
Every clause is:
Proposed
Simulated
Reviewed
Activated
Executed
Audited
Upgraded
Archived
All with proof, signatures, and jurisdictional trace.
Last updated
Was this helpful?