Lifecycle

The Structured Path from Clause Conception to Governance-Approved Execution and Sunset

3.2.1 Clause Lifecycle in NSF: Overview

Every Smart Clause in the NSF protocol passes through a deterministic, audit-traceable, and governance-controlled lifecycle:

  1. Draft – A new clause is proposed in SCL with supporting metadata

  2. Simulate – The clause is linked to a simulation package and risk scenarios

  3. Review – Governance DAOs validate, test, and vote on clause activation

  4. Deploy – The clause becomes active and callable in the execution layer

  5. Evolve – Forks, overrides, or jurisdictional adaptations may occur

  6. Deprecate – Clause is replaced or retired, but its audit trail remains immutable

This lifecycle ensures all clauses are credible, auditable, and governed from proposal to sunset.


3.2.2 Stage 1 – Draft

At the Draft stage:

  • A clause is authored using SCL (Smart Clause Language)

  • Metadata is declared: jurisdiction, clause type, inputs/outputs, credential impacts

  • Linked clause references and reusable templates can be included

  • The draft clause is:

    • Signed by the author (DID-anchored)

    • Versioned (v0.x.x)

    • Stored in the Draft Registry (a special namespace in the Registry Layer)

Draft clauses are non-executable and must not produce CACs.

Optional: Authors may include draft simulation stubs to describe intended behavior.


3.2.3 Stage 2 – Simulate

To move from draft to deployable, every clause must be simulated.

This step involves:

  • Selecting or creating a Simulation Package

  • Binding the simulation to the clause input structure and logic

  • Defining:

    • Forecast windows

    • Input datasets

    • Risk scenarios

    • Geographic overlays

    • Variable boundaries

The simulation package must be:

  • Reproducible

  • Signed by its authors

  • Stored in the Simulation Layer

  • Reviewed by domain-specific simulation validators

Simulation results are:

  • Linked to the clause draft

  • Included in governance DAO packets for review

  • Made accessible for downstream foresight comparison


3.2.4 Stage 3 – Review and DAO Governance

Once simulated, the clause is subject to:

  1. Formal Review by relevant domain or jurisdictional DAOs

  2. Public Comment period (optional or mandatory, per DAO rules)

  3. Governance Voting based on:

    • Simulation results

    • Risk classification

    • Jurisdictional relevance

    • Credential dependencies

Each vote creates:

  • A signed governance record

  • A quorum trace

  • A reference to the clause hash and simulation bundle

If the clause is approved, it is moved from Draft Registry to Active Registry, signed by the approving DAO.


3.2.5 Stage 4 – Deploy

Upon successful governance vote:

  • The clause becomes active and callable via Communication Layer APIs

  • Is registered in the Global Clause Registry

  • Can now:

    • Issue or revoke credentials

    • Trigger TEE/ZK execution

    • Be used as a reference in other clauses

    • Be linked in DAO proposals or compliance tools

At this stage:

  • All executions produce CACs

  • The clause enters the audit trail

  • DAO oversight transitions from proposal authority to version governance

Each clause is deployed with a unique Clause ID, generated as:

Original: ICAO::Aviation::[email protected]
Forked:   India::DGCA::[email protected]

E.g., ICAO::Aviation::[email protected]


3.2.6 Stage 5 – Evolution and Forking

After deployment, a clause may evolve through:

  • Minor upgrades (e.g., patch to correct a logic error, without simulation rerun)

  • Major upgrades (require new simulation + governance cycle)

  • Forks (for jurisdictional customization or policy divergence)

Each change generates:

  • A new clause ID

  • Simulation comparison report (if relevant)

  • Fork lineage in the Registry Layer

  • Metadata tags to track:

    • Parent clause

    • DAO that authorized the fork

    • Jurisdiction of divergence

    • Compatibility impacts

Forks are not deletions—they are traceable expressions of institutional autonomy.


3.2.7 Stage 6 – Deprecation

A clause may be deprecated due to:

  • Incompatibility with new policies

  • DAO vote to sunset based on audit/simulation outcomes

  • Replacement by a new clause version

  • Governance decision after failure, dispute, or override

Deprecation:

  • Freezes the clause state

  • Prevents new executions or CACs

  • Marks status in the Global Clause Registry

  • Retains full audit trace for every previous execution

Deprecated clauses remain discoverable, reviewable, and citable—but no longer active in production governance.


3.2.8 Full Lifecycle Traceability

NSF ensures:

  • Every clause has a governance-proven origin

  • Every change is tracked in the version tree and registry index

  • Every deployment is anchored to:

    • Simulation results

    • DAO governance

    • Audit-proven execution

  • Every sunset is documented with cause, time, and jurisdictional signatures

This model creates multi-jurisdictional trust with complete memory—something no traditional legal or policy system offers.


3.2.9 Tools Supporting Lifecycle Workflow

NSF provides:

  • SCL IDEs for clause authorship and syntax validation

  • Simulation runners and test harnesses

  • Governance dashboard for DAO review and vote tracking

  • Registry viewers for clause trace inspection

  • Audit tools for historical replay

  • Fork diff visualizers for policy comparison

  • Lifecycle event emitters (subscribe to all clause state changes)

All tools are open, credential-accessible, and verifiably linked to clause states.


3.2.10 Lifecycle as Governance Discipline

In NSF, the clause lifecycle:

  • Prevents opaque policy changes

  • Requires simulation before authority

  • Enforces jurisdictional boundaries through transparent forks

  • Tracks upgrades and deprecations across time and institutions

  • Encodes governance as a live, inspectable process—not a paper trail

With this lifecycle, governance becomes verifiable software, not hidden process.

Every clause is:

  • Proposed

  • Simulated

  • Reviewed

  • Activated

  • Executed

  • Audited

  • Upgraded

  • Archived

All with proof, signatures, and jurisdictional trace.

Last updated

Was this helpful?