Identity Privacy and Role Obfuscation
Enabling Secure, Role-Based Governance Without Compromising Identity Sovereignty or Operational Security
9.5.1 Why Identity Privacy Is Non-Negotiable
In the NSF environment, participants include:
Civil society actors
Treaty negotiators
Journalists and whistleblowers
Government operatives
AI agents executing clause-based logic
Public disclosure of roles or credentials can:
Compromise operational security
Expose individuals to retaliation or coercion
Undermine trust in multilateral negotiations
Violate treaty or jurisdictional confidentiality terms
Thus, identity obfuscation is a first-class design requirement—not a secondary privacy feature.
9.5.2 Identity vs. Role: A Governance Distinction
NSF separates:
Identity (DID)
Who you are, cryptographically anchored
Role (VC)
What you’re authorized to do, where, and under what conditions
Roles are executable; identities are protected.
This allows governance logic to:
Operate on the basis of role validity
Enforce jurisdictional and simulation boundaries
Without exposing underlying personal, institutional, or national identities
9.5.3 Identity Privacy Techniques
Pseudonymous DIDs
Rotating identifiers, unlinkable across proposals unless explicitly joined
Decoy DID Pools
Camouflaged execution triggers or DAO votes
Forward-Secure VC Presentation
Time-bound proofs of credential validity without replayable identifiers
Zero-Knowledge Role Assertions
“This agent has MonitorVC,” without disclosing DID or DAO history
Non-Correlation Keys
Fresh ephemeral keys for each session or clause interaction
Obfuscated Voting Traces
DAO ballots verified cryptographically, but anonymized within quorum logic
9.5.4 Role Obfuscation in Governance and Clause Execution
Roles may be:
Declared via ZK circuit
Tied to specific jurisdiction or clause domain
Hidden from public audit but traceable through verified aggregation
Presented only to execution engines (e.g., CAC, DAO, forecast validator)
This enables clause gating by authorization without violating individual privacy or institutional boundaries.
9.5.5 Anonymous DAO Participation
DAO participation includes:
Encrypted ballots
Voter eligibility verified via ZK-proven credentials
Vote results published without voter linkage
Obfuscated vote tallies for small quorums (to avoid inference)
This supports safe participation in contested regions or conflict zones.
9.5.6 Simulation Participation Without Identity Leakage
When a simulation requires sensitive input:
Inputs are hashed and obfuscated
Results are verified using STARK/zkVM proof bundles
Participants can submit results anonymously with validator signature rings
Any resulting clause trigger is verified independently
Use cases include:
Climate treaty backtesting
Pandemic modeling
Human rights clause activation
9.5.7 Credential Privacy and Revocation Visibility
NSF balances:
VC usability
Revocation traceability
Presenter privacy
Mechanisms:
Sparse Merkle trees for revocation
ZK inclusion proofs for validity without revealing credential hash
Conditional disclosure: attributes revealed only if needed for execution
Jurisdictional scope redaction via homomorphic filters
9.5.8 Threat Model: Deanonymization and Surveillance Resistance
NSF mitigates:
Credential linkability across proposals
DID tracing in DAO or clause logs
Side-channel leakage from execution timing or pattern matching
State-level decryption of public registry entries
Countermeasures include:
Execution delay randomization
DID unlinking across registry layers
Metadata stripping during bundle propagation
Simulated fake traffic during sensitive governance windows
9.5.9 Role Expiry, Rotation, and Nonce Policies
All roles expire unless renewed via DAO or credential signer
Role-nonce policies prevent role reuse across domains
Simulation-based validation needed for role reissuance
DAO triggers can rotate or revoke roles based on behavior or incident reports
This supports situational, scoped, and revocable authorization frameworks.
9.5.10 Privacy as a Governance Right
In NSF:
Governance is not conditional on public exposure
Simulation-based legitimacy replaces identity-based trust
Execution integrity does not require personal sacrifice
Auditors can verify outcomes, not participants
NSF makes identity privacy a structural requirement—not a user preference—enabling safe participation in planetary-scale, high-stakes governance.
Last updated
Was this helpful?