Home

Clause Import/Export: Format and Schema Translation

Enabling Portability, Compatibility, and Jurisdictional Transformation of Executable Governance Logic

8.3.1 Why Clause Portability Matters

For NSF to support sovereign-grade, globally interoperable execution, its clause logic must be:

  • Transferable across governance systems and legal traditions

  • Readable and modifiable by external systems (governments, NGOs, digital twins, treaty simulators)

  • Executable in diverse runtime contexts (on-chain, TEE, air-gapped, private cloud)

  • Upgradeable or remapped to different schemas, risk models, or regulatory frameworks

Clause import/export capabilities make NSF a true governance substrate—enabling multilateral reuse of trusted logic in diverse digital and legal infrastructures.

8.3.2 Core Export Formats Supported

Each clause authored in NSF's internal DSL is exportable to:

Format
Use Case

JSON-LD

Semantic web compatibility, legal-tech mapping, clause registries

Open Policy Agent (Rego)

Integration with enterprise logic firewalls and cloud-native environments

WebAssembly (WASM)

On-chain execution and multi-runtime TEE compatibility

Solidity / Vyper

Clause components exportable to smart contract platforms (EVM-based)

Legal XML

Structured documentation for government, court systems, treaty archives

Natural Language Companion

AI-generated legal paraphrase bound to hash of executable logic

XBRL

Clause logic as financial or ESG compliance artifacts for audit systems

Exported formats are versioned, signed, and anchored to clause hashes in the Clause Registry.

8.3.3 Import Pipelines from External Governance Systems

NSF includes import adapters for:

Source
Example

OECD or IMF Digital Clauses

Fiscal rules, subsidy constraints, macro indicators

Treaty Texts (UN, WHO, ITU)

Legally ratified commitments parsed into conditional triggers

Climate Agreements

Carbon market logic, biodiversity enforcement clauses

Regulatory Code

Local or regional rules modeled into clause equivalents (e.g., GDPR, Basel III)

Enterprise Governance Policies

Cyber-risk thresholds, procurement logic, ESG obligations

External logic is parsed into NSF clause skeletons using the Clause Importer Engine (CIE), which supports:

  • Semantic parsing (using ontology + GPT-based transformation)

  • Risk template mapping

  • Credential requirement binding

  • Governance scope assignment

8.3.4 Clause Syntax Mapping and Language Transformations

Each imported or exported clause undergoes:

  1. Syntax normalization (e.g., JSON → DSL)

  2. Schema translation (e.g., risk_score → simulation.risk_output)

  3. Credential remapping (e.g., user roles to NSF Verifiable Credentials)

  4. Trigger logic reconciliation (e.g., threshold operators, governance constraints)

  5. Simulation template alignment (ensuring clause logic matches NSF simulation formats)

This ensures executability fidelity across contexts.

8.3.5 Legal Compatibility and Interpretability Layer

Each clause includes:

  • Jurisdiction tag: ISO 3166 and subnational identifiers

  • Language mapping: IETF BCP 47 tags for linguistic rendering

  • Natural language companion hash: Cryptographically bound AI-generated explanation

  • Legal modality flags: binding, advisory, emergency, treaty-linked, SDG-aligned

  • Compatibility index: Estimated match with ISO, W3C, ICAO, WHO policy corpora

This allows multilateral institutions to adopt, localize, or review clauses within their own governance structures.

8.3.6 Cross-Jurisdictional Clause Translation Protocol

When a clause is deployed in one jurisdiction (e.g., FloodRelief@BD) but needs to be reused elsewhere (FloodRelief@MZ), NSF triggers:

  • Schema translation: unit systems, geo-taxonomies, actor types

  • Simulation rebinding: local models, sensor integrations

  • Credential remapping: aligning VC issuers and trusted authorities

  • Governance scope adjustment: DAO anchors and risk thresholds

  • Legal and treaty flag re-registration

All changes are logged and versioned in the Clause Registry, and simulations are required before redeployment.

8.3.7 Forking and Clause Lineage Management

NSF tracks clause forks through:

  • Parent/child clause hashes

  • Justification metadata

  • Fork scope and jurisdiction

  • Simulation validation reuse (or rejection)

  • Signature sets from SimDAO and relevant governance DAOs

Forks must include execution equivalence declarations or divergence proofs for audit purposes.

8.3.8 Clause Packaging and Transfer Artifacts

Each clause export is bundled into a Clause Bundle:

{
  "clause_id": "[email protected]",
  "format": "JSON-LD",
  "hash": "0xa4c9...",
  "language": "en-GB",
  "source_registry": "NSF.global/registry",
  "simulation_bindings": ["[email protected]"],
  "credential_requirements": ["DisasterCoordinatorVC"],
  "natural_language": "Flood relief payout triggers if rainfall exceeds 250mm in 7 days.",
  "audit_bundle": "/audit/clauses/[email protected]"
}

Artifacts are machine-readable, jurisdiction-declarative, and simulation-verifiable.

8.3.9 Clause Registry and Export Governance

  • All imports/exports must be registered in the NSF Clause Registry

  • Governance rules define which DAOs or actors can approve transformations

  • Simulations must be rerun or equivalence proofs filed post-transformation

  • Jurisdictional fingerprinting prevents unauthorized clause migration

8.3.10 Interoperability as Clause Portability

By enabling clause logic to flow across machines, nations, DAOs, and institutions, NSF ensures:

  • Reusable governance intelligence

  • Executable global agreements

  • Policy liquidity across platforms

  • Verifiable legal-tech integration

  • Disaster-, treaty-, and ESG-ready digital clauses for any context

This makes NSF the foundation for a shared execution layer for global institutions and digital societies.

PreviousAPI Gateways and Resolver InterfacesNextEvent Bus Integration for External Triggering

Last updated

Was this helpful?