Node Onboarding
Establishing Trust-Minimized, Policy-Compliant Entry Points into the Global NSF Ecosystem
10.1.1 Purpose and Strategic Role
NSF nodes are not merely network participants—they are:
Clause execution authorities
Forecast validators and simulation relays
Credential issuance endpoints
Governance units with localized or domain-specific autonomy
The process of onboarding nodes and accrediting credential issuers must therefore ensure:
Alignment with simulation-based governance principles
Compliance with jurisdictional, treaty, or sectoral requirements
Capability to participate in verifiable, fault-tolerant execution architectures
Participation in global trust infrastructure under zero-trust conditions
10.1.2 Node Types and Functions
GCR Nodes
Operated by national or regional foresight authorities (e.g., ministries, research centers)
DAO Nodes
Govern clause lifecycles, credential logic, simulation approvals
Execution Nodes
Run enclave-based clause execution, CAC bundles, and ZK verifiers
Credential Nodes
Host credential issuance, revocation, and audit trails
Observer Nodes
Read-only mirrors for treaty zones, institutions, or verification agencies
Edge Nodes
Lightweight offline or low-power clause agents in field deployments
10.1.3 Node Onboarding Lifecycle
Step 1: Intent Registration
DID submission + jurisdiction declaration
Node type, clause domain, and expected simulation class
Step 2: Simulation Environment Validation
Proof of simulation capability (test templates, outputs)
Performance benchmarking under adversarial inputs
Step 3: VC Authority Attestation
Submission of VC signer keys
DAO-verified schema registry alignment
Merkle-linked revocation registry with test proofs
Step 4: Governance Pledge and Policy Lock
Node accepts a governance profile (e.g., SDG alignment, treaty clauses, DAO obligations)
Fallback triggers and accountability circuit installed
Step 5: Multisig Anchoring and Snapshot Inclusion
Final onboarding logged to global node registry
Enclave configuration hash signed by onboarding quorum
Revocable endorsement credential issued
10.1.4 Credential Issuer Accreditation Protocol
To become a recognized VC issuer, an entity must:
Submit a VC schema proposal via CredentialDAO
Demonstrate domain authority or legal mandate
Sign initial test credentials with full ZK audit capability
Anchor signer DIDs in the global DID registry with cross-DAO recognition
Pass simulation tests to demonstrate impact-neutral role issuance
Issuers are graded along:
Jurisdictional trustworthiness
ZK privacy compliance
Simulation-informed impact score
Rate-limited VC emission history
Revocation rights can be delegated, audited, or clawed back by DAO quorum.
10.1.5 Post-Quantum and Metadata Policy Requirements
All nodes and issuers must:
Use post-quantum safe signing algorithms (e.g., Dilithium, FALCON)
Rotate keys per issuance schedule or policy update
Avoid cross-clause or cross-jurisdiction metadata leakage
Support selective disclosure and Merkle-based ZK inclusion proofs
Accept DID decoupling mandates for privacy-preserving issuance
10.1.6 Continuous Node Scoring and Probation Logic
NSF maintains real-time scoring across all active nodes:
Uptime and CAC reliability
ExecutionDAO
Clause divergence rate
SimulationDAO
Revocation responsiveness
CredentialDAO
Quorum participation
GovernanceDAO
Error rates / rollback logs
AuditDAO
Adversarial simulation pass/fail logs
StressSimDAO
Nodes falling below performance thresholds are automatically:
Flagged for DAO review
Isolated from new clause sets
Downgraded to observer role
Subject to multisig freeze or key revocation
10.1.7 Anchoring in Treaty Zones and National DPIs
NSF allows nodes to be scoped to:
Treaty zones (e.g., Paris Agreement, IPBES, WHO)
National Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) stacks
Intergovernmental institutions (e.g., ICAO, FAO, UN regional centers)
Special profiles enforce:
Legal signature compliance
SDG binding schema
AI clause simulation sandboxing
Multi-jurisdictional clause registry mirroring
Interoperability with W3C, ISO, and WHO standards
10.1.8 Governance Identity and Accountability Structures
All nodes and issuers must:
Be associated with a governance DID
Publish public keys with revocation policies
Sign governance participation records
Participate in clause audits when requested
Bind their operations to minimum simulation thresholds
10.1.9 Emergency Suspension and Recovery Triggers
DAO-governed triggers can:
Revoke issuer rights immediately under threat conditions
Freeze clause execution on specific nodes
Suspend simulation participation or credential validation
Force fallbacks to other regional nodes or treaty anchors
Require re-onboarding and fresh simulation validation
Every action is:
Logged
Signed
Auditable via ZK rollups and multisig attestations
10.1.10 Node and Issuer Governance as Planetary-Scale Trust Mechanism
NSF’s onboarding and accreditation processes enable:
Multilateral trust across jurisdictions, disciplines, and simulation domains
Sovereign-grade credential flows with revocation and verification
Disaster-proof resilience through replication and fallback
Clause composability based on authorized execution zones
Institutional-grade accountability, encoded in execution logic itself
NSF does not assume trust—it constructs it, layer by layer, through simulation, verification, and protocol-enforced governance.
Last updated
Was this helpful?